[seqfan] Re: A098550.
L. Edson Jeffery
lejeffery2 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 9 00:43:22 CET 2014
>We have a suggestion here that the a(0) term should be omitted,
>leaving offset 1. L. Edson Jeffery in a pink-box comment suggests
>changing the offset to 1 without taking 0 out of the sequence.
>In my opinion, these two arguments cancel out in favor of leaving
>the sequence as it is.
Well, I think your sequence would be nicer without 0 as the first term, but
your definition works. My "argument" was that the sequence (with or without
0) is a list and should have offset 1. For example, A098550 is similarly
defined and has offset 1.
Ed Jeffery
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list