[seqfan] Re: [LIKELY_SPAM] Re: 0-additive and first differences
Frank Adams-Watters
franktaw at netscape.net
Wed May 13 22:05:11 CEST 2015
OK. 0-additive is different from what I thought.
So, I want the lexicographically first sequence such that the sequence and its absolute first differences are all distinct. This starts as I stated, and it isn't in the database. A095115 is an approximation to this, but it doesn't really do any backtracking and is thus finite.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Angelini <Eric.Angelini at kntv.be>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Wed, May 13, 2015 1:37 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: [LIKELY_SPAM] Re: 0-additive and first differences
Hello Frank,
no, your last 19 is forbidden
as 19 is 7+12 and both terms
are
already in the seq
Catapulté de mon aPhone
> Le 13 mai 2015 à 19:40, Frank
Adams-Watters <franktaw at netscape.net> a écrit :
>
> If I understand what's
happening here, wouldn't we instead start
>
> 1,3,7,12,18,10,19, ...
>
diff 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Eric Angelini <Eric.Angelini at kntv.be>
> To: Sequence
Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Sent: Wed, May 13, 2015
11:36 am
> Subject: [seqfan] 0-additive and first differences
>
>
> Hello
SeqFans,
> This is (I hope) the lexico-first 0-additive seq such
> that
>
sequence and first differences list all positive numbers
> exactly once:
>
>
> S = 1, 3, 7, 12, 18, 26, 17, 28, 41, 51, 37, 22, 47, ...
> diff 2 4
5 6
> 8 9 11 13 10 14 15
> 25
>
> Best,
> É.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list -
http://list.seqfan.eu/
_______________________________________________
Seqfan
Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list