[SeqFan] Re: least number not present in table.

[Patrick De Geest]

N. J. A. Sloane wrote:
> 
> Patrick de Geest asked what is the smallest number not at present in any sequence
> 
> the answer is 4775
> 
> then 5095
> 
> NJAS

Well, I have to admit, this relatively low number 4775 amazed me.
My first 'guess' was a number around 100000. Quite wrong !

Thanks for this fun info, Neil.

- -- 
Patrick De Geest
[mailto:Patrick.DeGeest at ping.be]
- ---------------------------------------------------
URL : http://www.ping.be/~ping6758/index.shtml
- ---------------------------------------------------