A054770

[Jud McCranie]

At 05:08 PM 6/6/00 -0400, Jud McCranie wrote:

>These are my preliminary, quick and dirty results.  There may be an error, 
>for instance if phi isn't calculated accurately enough.  But I get 439203 
>(Lucas[27]-1) as not the sum of distinct Lucas numbers, it is the 121394th 
>such term, but the conjecture of n gives 439206.
>
>Again, these are preliminary results, so I'm not sure of them.


Whoops, I made an error.  439203 is not a counterexample - it is 
representable as the sum of distinct Lucas numbers.


+--------------------------------------------------------+
|                  Jud McCranie                          |
|                                                        |
| 137*2^261147+1 is prime!  (78,616 digits, 5/2/00)      |
+--------------------------------------------------------+