Recaman numbers

Jud McCranie jud.mccranie at
Thu Oct 4 17:57:36 CEST 2001

At 11:48 AM 10/4/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Following the recent flurry of notes on the Recaman numbers (A005132),
>I finally couldn't resist the temptation to get involved.  I have completed
>the calculation of R(n) to beyond n=2 billion and a calculation proceeding
>as I write will push this to 15 billion.  The much sought-after R=1355 does
>not occur by n=2 billion, the seven smallest values that have not occurred
>by then being 1355, 1643, 1814, 2405, 2406, 2520, and 2991.

That means that 2426 popped up somewhere between 310,783,000 and 
2,000,000,000, so there is still hope for 1355.

|     Jud McCranie                                        |
|                                                         |
| Programming Achieved with Structure, Clarity, And Logic |

More information about the SeqFan mailing list