idivisors (2)

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Mon Sep 3 14:37:30 CEST 2001


Wouter,   You said:

>
>Sadly, 
>I have to warn that the above procedures do not reproduce  A037445, but they
>do fit with A049417.
>disagreement with A037445 is found for {36, 47, 48, 51, 56, 58, 61, 70, 74,
>75}, where
>A037445 gives {8, 4, 8, 2, 4, 8, 4, 4, 8, 8},
>


No, i don't think that is correct!  Here is the entry for A037445:

%S A037445 1,2,2,2,2,4,2,4,2,4,2,4,2,4,4,2,2,4,2,4,4,4,2,8,2,4,4,4,2,8,2,4,4,4,4,
%T A037445 4,2,4,4,8,2,8,2,4,4,4,2,4,2,4,4,4,2,8,4,8,4,4,2,8,2,4,4,4,4,8,2,4,4,8,
%U A037445 2,8,2,4,4,4,4,8,2,4,2,4,2,8,4,4,4,8,2,8,4,4,4,4,4,8,2,4,4,4,2,8,2,8,8

with offset 1.   So a(36) = 4, which agrees with
what you have

Neil





More information about the SeqFan mailing list