Sequences of Graphs...
Christian G. Bower
bowerc at usa.net
Thu Dec 5 19:52:47 CET 2002
I remember an example where the formula for one graph sequence depended
on the 0 term of another graph sequence.
A038002 has generating function B(x) * (B(x) + 1) for B the g.f. of
A000107.
I specifically remember this one because at the time, A000107 did not
specify an a(0) term which would have made the formula for A038002
awkward. I felt adding such a term to be the best solution.
While I don't think this is an argument for adding such a term to every
graph sequence, it is an argument for not removing existing terms or at
least for being very careful when doing so.
Christian
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list