New seq?
Richard Guy
rkg at cpsc.ucalgary.ca
Wed Oct 9 17:26:57 CEST 2002
The main interest is in the quotient. This
isn't an integer when p = 2 or 3.
S(2) = S(3) = 1, which is not divisible
by p = 2 or 3. How Neil indicates the
starting gun for such a sequence is a
question I can't answer. If the S(p) seq
is to be incorporated, then it should, I
agree, begin 1 1 5 7 22 39 68 ..., and
perhaps the first term here is for n=1. R.
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Richard Guy wrote:
>
> > p 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41
> > S(p) 5 7 22 39 68 76 92 203 186 333 410
> > quot 1 1 2 3 4 4 4 7 6 9 10
>
> Neil's superseeker doesn't find 1 1 2 3 4 4 4 7 6 9 10,
> BTW, what's wrong with p(1) = and p(2) = 3 ? Bye, Frank
>
>
>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list