yet more primes

[all at abouthugo.de]

"N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com> schrieb am 04.12.2003,
00:59:32:
> well, at least get it right!
> 
> not
[...] 
> 33 35 41 43 51 71 75 83 87 91
[...] 
> but rather
> 
> [2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 41, 43, 51, 52,
[...]
> 
> Neil

 From pfgw-prime.log
(840*31)+175177943
(840*33)+175177943
(840*34)+175177943
(840*35)+175177943
(840*36)+175177943
(840*38)+175177943

One should not copy/paste unchecked loops with "step 2" in PFGW!
:-<<< sorry

Hugo