GerardS wrote: > I wrote a simple REXX program that had 1000 digits (decimal) of > accuracy. > I found that 62 wasn't in the sequence, and 732 was the last before > 1,111. > I'll run the program overnight to 10,001 and see what comes out. Since E^2303 ~ 10^1000, methinks you'll find 1351 and 1907, but not 5469.