a/b + b/c + c/a = n

[Jud McCranie]

At 12:25 AM 7/13/2003, Hans Havermann wrote:
Is that second triple correct? Anyways, I did a quick implementation of 
this taking {d, e, f} up to 1000:

>{3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 51, 53, 54, 
>57, 66, 69, 83,

With the corrected second triple, I get different results:

  6,7,8,9,10,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,23,24,26,27,29,30,31,38,41,43,44,45,47,
  48,51,53,54,57,61,62,66,69,71,79,83,86,88,91,92,94,105,106,126,141,149,152,
  154,161,163,166,169,174,177,178,195,201,206,209,210,229,230,237,243,250,256,
  261,269,294,323,326,329,333,366,389,405,446,451,478,489,534,581,613,622,629,
  630,633,655,681,726,734,747,789,799,846,847,854,905,966,978,1002,1011,1040,
  1097,1114,1316,1410,1491,1658,1661,1713,1718,1725,1769,1875,1890,1893,1953,
  2163,2231,2309,2361,2369,2378,2397,2525,2550,2681,3290,3691,3974,4887,5220,
  5959,6152,6318,7061,7183,7410,7689,9653,10995,12713,12815,13971,14803,14947,
  15925,16448,17738,18014,20778,20953,21529,26325,27791,32671,37014,40100,
  48321,48731,58685,59802,61974,70093,76986,80290,83088,97813