Fib(n)Fib(n+1) versus Expansion of 1/(1+2*x-2*x^2-x^3)

[wouter meeussen]

spooks, ghost, apparitions, mirages?

first "1,2,6,14,36,88,220" yielded 2 seqs, one with nice links to
Fib(n)Fib(n+1) and its familiars, the other, more recent, just gave a
bare 1/(1+2*x-2*x^2-x^3).

Now, without further adoo, two bare seqs
A077937 and A077981 result \ remain,
worse than before.

The original objection against A077982  (being superfluous)
*now* seems incomprehenible gibberish, since *that* now reads as

ID Number: A077982
Sequence:  0,1,2,2,3,2,3,2,3,3,4,2,3,2,3,4,4,2,3,2,3,4,4,2,3,3,4,4,4,2,

Ahoi !
did I misquote the A-number?
My god, what have I done (?!)

or is it something I said?

W.






----- Original Message -----
From: <frank.ellermann at t-online.de>
To: "wouter meeussen" <wouter.meeussen at pandora.be>
Cc: "EIS fans" <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Fib(n)Fib(n+1) versus Expansion of 1/(1+2*x-2*x^2-x^3)


> wouter meeussen wrote:
>
> > A077982 seems superfluous next to the older
> [...]
> > A001654
>
> Your observation apparently killed it, time to download the new
> database... ;-)