Help: A038537 and possible new seq

[Frank Ellermann]

Jack Brennen wrote:

> never got around to double-checking or submitting anyplace:
[more "wonderful" primes]

Edwin's reply to David's challenge was so fast that I don't
try again to list the base 9 .. base 2 variants of your
candidates, apparently Maple has a function for this purpose ;-)

But at least I found a bug in my REXX baseconv(), credits to
Rick Shepherd and his improved A031979 / A049356.  Bye, Frank