Graphs with automorphism groups of given order
Jens Voss
jens at voss-ahrensburg.de
Thu Mar 27 08:52:18 CET 2003
"Ed Pegg" wrote:
>
> Can you send me pictures or descriptions of all of these
> graphs?
>
> I will clean up the pictures (to any extent required) and
> post them in the Mathworld encyclopedia.
Sure, here are descriptions of the graphs involved:
Let K_n, E_n and C_n denote the complete, empty resp. cycle graphs on n
vertices. For every graph G, let G' be the complement of G. Then the
following hold:
(1) |K_n| = n and Aut(K_n) = S_n
(2) |E_n| = n and Aut(E_n) = S_n
(3) |C_n| = n and Aut(C_n) = D_(2n) (for n >= 3)
(4) |K_2 + E_2| = 4 and Aut(K_n + E_n) = Z_2 x Z_2
(5) |C_n + E_2| = n+2 and Aut(C_n + E_2) = D_(2n) x Z_2 (for n >= 3)
As corollaries, we get the upper bounds
a(n!) <= n
a(2n) <= n (for n >= 3)
a(4n) <= n+2 (for n >= 3)
a(4) <= 4
For the odd terms, we look at two constructions:
For n >= 3, let A_n be the graph with vertices {a_i, b_i, c_i | 0 <= i < n} and
edges {(a_i,a_(i+1)), (a_i,b_i), (a_i,c_i), (b_i,c_i), (c_i,a_(i+1)) | 0 <= i < n}
(where all indices are to be read modulo n).
To picture this: A_n is made up of an n-gon (a_0, ..., a_(n-1)) with a
rectangle drawn over each side plus one diagonal in each rectangle.
(6) |A_n| = 3n and Aut(A_n) = Z_n
Now let m be a divisor of n. Let (A_n)/m the graph obtained from A_n by identifying
b_i with every b_j where i is congruent j modulo (n/m) and likewise for the c_i.
Then we have
(7) |(A_n)/m| = n + 2n/m and Aut((A_n)/m) = Z_n if n > 4 and m < n
The other construction requires n >= 6. Let B_n be the graph with vertices
{a_i, b_i | 0 <= i < n} and edges
{(a_i,a_(i+1)), (a_i,b_(i-1)), (a_i,b_i), (a_i,b_(i+1)), (a_i,b_(i+3)) | 0 <= i < n}
(again all indices modulo n). Then the following can be shown:
(8) |B_n| = 2n and Aut(B_n) = Z_n
Now we can give a list of upper bounds for the numbers submitted:
1: |E_0| = 0
2: |E_2| = 2
3: |A_3| = 9
4: |K_2 + E_2| = 4
5: |A_5| = 15
6: |C_3| = 3
7: |B_7| = 14
8: |C_4| = 4
9: |(A_9)/3| = 15
10: |C_5| = 5
11: |B_11| = 22
12: |C_3 + E_2| = 5
13: |B_13| = 26
14: |C_7| = 7
15: |(A_15)/5| = 21
16: |C_4 + E_2| = 6
17: |B_17| = 34
18: |C_9| = 9
19: |B_19| = 38
20: |C_5 + E_2| = 7
21: |B_7 + A_3| = 23
22: |C_11| = 11
23: |B_23| = 46
24: |E_4| = 4
25: |A_5 + (A_5)'| = 30
26: |C_13| = 13
27: |(A_9)/3 + A_3| = 24
28: |C_7 + E_2| = 9
29: |B_29| = 58
30: |A_3 + C_5| = 14
31: |B_31| = 62
The proofs that these graphs provide in fact LEAST upper bounds are quite
tedious, and are left to the interested readers :)
Regards,
Jens
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list