Why does this sequence exist?

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Mon Aug 30 17:46:52 CEST 2004


Jeremy said:

The entry in the OEIS for A082218  now reads
1,3,5,6,7,12,10,19,25,15,37,18,23,11
however this differs from the sequence given by David Wasserman in the
original e-mail.

Maybe I'm missing something but it seems to me the OEIS sequence no longer
fits it's description.


Me:   as I understand it, the original sequence
had some errors, which David Wasserman has corrected.

NJAS





More information about the SeqFan mailing list