Why does this sequence exist?
N. J. A. Sloane
njas at research.att.com
Mon Aug 30 17:46:52 CEST 2004
Jeremy said:
The entry in the OEIS for A082218 now reads
1,3,5,6,7,12,10,19,25,15,37,18,23,11
however this differs from the sequence given by David Wasserman in the
original e-mail.
Maybe I'm missing something but it seems to me the OEIS sequence no longer
fits it's description.
Me: as I understand it, the original sequence
had some errors, which David Wasserman has corrected.
NJAS
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list