Bernoulli numbers and arithmetic progressions

[Edwin Clark]

On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Richard Guy wrote:

> Evidently yet another manifestation of
> the Law of Small Numbers.  R.
> 
> > 
> > {666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 
> > 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 666, 
> > 666, 666, 666, 1332, 666, 666, 666, 1332, 111, 1221, 148, 1184, 185, 
> > 1147, 222, 1110, 259, 1073, 296, 1036, 333, 999, 370, 962, 407, ...}
> > 

I realize that no one want to mention it, but there is something
Devilishly wrong with this. :-)