quiz

[y.kohmoto]

    Frank Ellermann wrote : 
>y.kohmoto wrote:
> 
>> I think "periodic" is not a reason for rejection.
>
>In fact there are many (?) periodic sequences in the OEIS,
>so that alone isn't a reason for a rejection.  But I didn't
>understand your original example with big numbers.
>
>If that's some pattern, and you think it's "interesting",
>maybe you could find the same pattern with smaller terms ?
>
>So if 1002, 1004, 1008, 1004, 1002, 1001, 1002, 1004, ...
>is one of your patterns, but you find the same effect for
>2, 4, 8, 4, 2, 1, 2, 4, ... maybe submit the latter.
>
>There are only three lines with terms (about 200 characters
>including digits, commata, and minus signs), I'd always try
>to get as much info into the OEIS "fingerprint" as possible.
>
>                         Bye, Frank
>

    I have some examples much smaller.
    I will post it.

    Yasutoshi