Egyptian-Fraction Expansions Of REALS
Karol PENSON
penson at lptl.jussieu.fr
Wed Jan 21 18:58:48 CET 2004
Dear Thomas, I have got your message and it is dated
30 Jul 2004
Please check what is going on to avoid any further
complications. Karol
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Thomas Baruchel wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:05:52 +0200
> From: Thomas Baruchel <thomas.baruchel at laposte.net>
> To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
> Subject: Re: Egyptian-Fraction Expansions Of REALS
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:31:13PM -0500, Jud McCranie wrote:
> > No, don't write it as 1+1+1. For the sequence, make the first term the
> > integer part and continue with the denominators. For one thing, the
> > Egyptians didn't do that. Secondly, the sequence could start with a very
> > long string of 1s. (Alternatively, skip the integer part altogether.)
>
> Right. Besides, the initial motivation for writing 1+1+1 was not good,
> because the general mind of egyptian fractions is to avoid using
> twice a fraction with identical denominator: 1/3+1/3 is forbidden.
> Just starting with "3+" is much better than "1+1+1" which would certainly
> not be "more egyptian"...
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________________
Karol A. PENSON
Universite Paris 6 | Internet : penson at lptl.jussieu.fr.
Lab. Physique Theorique des |
Liquides | http://www.lptl.jussieu.fr/users/penson
4, place Jussieu, Tour 16, Et. 5| Tel : (33 1) 44 27 72 33
75252 Paris Cedex 05, France | Fax : (33 1) 44 27 51 00
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list