Sequential Squares -- A005842
Ed Pegg Jr
edp at wolfram.com
Tue Mar 30 08:50:09 CEST 2004
> There is no indication anywhere of whether these are proven values, or
> "best currently known" values.
>
> It would be really useful if this kind of information were
> incorporated into the entries so that viewers know the boundaries
> between knowledge and research problem...
>
> Should there be an explicit *required field* for this information? I
> thought that originally Neil only wanted sequences of proven values,
> but obviously many sequences violate this...
Probably. But this is one of Neil's original sequences. It looks like
a rare mistake
by Martin Gardner and R K Guy. If not for Shigeyoshi's clever solution,
this error
might have remained for decades.
--Ed Pegg Jr
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list