Divisible by 12: a^3 + b^3 = c^2
James Buddenhagen
jbuddenh at earthlink.net
Sat Nov 20 04:42:47 CET 2004
Recently I posted here that if a+b and a^2-a*b+b^2 are
both 3 times squares, then a parameterized solution for
the Diophantine equation
(1) a^3+b^3=c^2
is:
a = 3*m^4-n^4+6*m^2*n^2
b = -3*m^4+n^4+6*m^2*n^2
c = 6*m*n*(3*m^4+n^4)
This gives infinitely many solutions, but not all solutions,
as Hans Havermann has pointed out to me in private email.
Since several sequences in OEIS are concerned with the
Diophantine equation (1), let me say a little more about it.
First, if (a,b,c) is a solution of (1) then so is
(k^2*a,k^2*b,k^3*c), for any k. So let us say that two solutions
(a,b,c) and (a',b',c') are equivalent if there is a non-zero
rational number k such that (a',b',c')=(k^2*a,k^2*b,k^3*c).
This is an equivalence relation and each equivalence class has a
reduced (or primitive) representative (a,b,c) such that
a,b,c are integers and the largest integer n such that
n^2|a and n^2|b and n^3|c is n=1. All this works just as
well if a,b,c are allowed to be rational numbers and we can
pass from a rational solution of (1) to the primitive integer
solution in the same equivalence class by using the proper
value for k. Thus we may as well be looking for all rational
points on the curve x^3+y^3=c^2. This is actually an elliptic
curve, and as we vary c we get a family of ellipic curves.
So, we are really looking for all rational points on the elliptic
surface x^3+y^3=z^2. Is is not reasonable to expect a complete
parametric solution, but in the case where a+b and a^2-a*b+b^2
are both three times a square such a solution is given below.
Theorem: (a,b,c) is a rational solution to (1) a^3+b^3=c^2 in
which a+b and a^2-a*b+b^2 are both 3 times a rational square,
if and only if there exist rational numbers u and v such that
a = u*(3*u^2*v^4-1+6*u*v^2),
(2) b = -u*(3*u^2*v^4-1-6*u*v^2),
c = 6*v*u^2*(3*u^2*v^4+1).
Some examples:
solution (a,b,c) to (1) values for (u,v) in (2)
(11, 37, 228) (16, 1/8)
(37, 11, 228) (3, 2/3)
(1, 2, 3) (3/4, 2/3)
(100, 200, 3000) (75, 1/15)
(71, -23, 588) (1, 2)
(23/2, 1/2, -39) (1/2, -2)
I won't give a proof of the theorem here, but substituting (2) into
(1) gives an identity so that direction is just a computation. Also,
notice that replacing u by k^2*u and v by v/k changes (a,b,c) given
by (2) to (k^2*a,k^2*b,k^3*c) so we can easily move within any equivalence
class of solutions. Hence it suffices to show that there exist rationals
u,v such that the right sides of (2) give some (a',b',c') equivalent to
the given (a,b,c). I'll leave it at that for now.
Some sequences related to the Diophantine equation (1) are:
A099806, A099807, A099808, A099809, A098970, A099426.
Jim Buddenhagen
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list