Numbers which have a "compact" form...
jb at brennen.net
jb at brennen.net
Fri Apr 1 19:42:28 CEST 2005
Consider the sequence of positive integers which have a "compact"
representation which uses fewer decimal digits than just writing
the number out normally. You are allowed to use the following
symbols as well:
( ) grouping
+ addition
- subtraction
* multiplication
/ division
^ exponentiation
(Not sure if it matters, but assume that you can use the
unary minus sign, as well...)
If I'm not mistaken, the sequence would begin:
125, 128, 216, 243, 256, 343, 512, 625, 729, 1000,
1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023,
1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032,
1033, ...
(Note that 1015 to 1033 are all representable in the
form 4^5-d or 4^5+d, where d is a single digit.
1029 can also be written as 7^3*3.)
This sequence doesn't seem to be in the OEIS.
Does this sequence have density 1? Or an even stronger
conjecture: Are there only a finite number of positive
integers which are NOT in the sequence? If so, can
anything be determined about the largest integer without
a "compact" representation?
Jack
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list