Self-junk

[Eric Angelini]

Jud McCranie :

> Doesn't rule 4 violate rule 3?


 >>3) When adding a new integer to the sequence, put always
 >>    the smallest unused so far
 >>
 >>4) Always have in mind that the final sequence must be as
 >>    long as possible -- this explains why the above 8th
 >>    integer is "1122" and not "1111", for instance: "1111"
 >>    would block the sequence very fast:

... yes, strictly speaking, you are right... well... you know
what I had in mind... Let's merge the two rules together:

   3) When adding a new integer to the sequence, put always
      the smallest unused so far which allows the final se-
      quence to be as long as possible.

Does it fix the pb ?
Best,
É.