A062679: Something's wrong

Fri May 6 18:26:38 CEST 2005

Sorry, 
sure 9 and 81 are not OK, because they have divisors (3, 27) not containing 9;
1691=89*19 is the least non-prime number in A062679.
so it's OK with entries and name and examples in A062679
(and Neil, 
I guess I may send my sequence "primes with maximal digit = 9"
with comment: "first differs from A062679 in 1691, or smth like").

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Michele Dondi [mailto:blazar at pcteor1.mi.infn.it] 
	Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 4:51 PM 
	To: זקיר סעידוב - ד"ר/Zakir Seidov Ph.D. 
	Cc: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr 
	Subject: Re: A062679: Something's wrong

	On Fri, 6 May 2005, [utf-8] ~V×§~Y×¨ ×¡×¢~Y~S~U~Q - ~S\"×¨/Zakir Seidov Ph.D. wrote:

	>       something's wrong with A062679:
	>       enties are all "primes with maximal digit = 9"
	>       (which I wished to submit?!),
	>       while name and example say quite other things
	>       (why e.g.  are 9, 81,... absent?)

	Do 9, 81,... happen to be primes?

	Michele
	--
	>What is the current status of chaos theory? A decade ago it was supposed
	>to be The Next Big Thing.
	Yeah, well, that kind of thing is notoriously hard to predict, longterm.
	- Lee Rudolph in sci.math, "Re: Chaos Theory?" 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20050506/41c4ef7f/attachment-0001.htm>