a(27) in A059097: A new lower higher bound

[David Wilson]

I didn't see any discussion on adding 0 to A059097 if there was any.
Didn't mean to imply you were against the idea.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Guy" <rkg at cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
To: "David Wilson" <davidwwilson at comcast.net>
Cc: "Alonso Del Arte" <alonso.delarte at gmail.com>; <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: a(27) in A059097: A new lower higher bound


>I agree -- did I suggest otherwise?   R.
> 
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, David Wilson wrote:
> 
>> 0 is a proper domain value for A059097 and should be 
>> included in the sequence.
>>