No further need for semi-voluntary moratorium:REJECTED SEQs

[Graeme McRae]

Dear NJASloane and Seqfans, there's only one thing wrong with this sequence, 
and that's the %N -- it should read, "What the Fibonacci Sequence would be 
if 233+377 were equal to 600, 977+1577 were equal to 2544, 1577+2544=4121 
were equal to 4129, and 45752+74029 were equal to 110981."  :)
--Graeme

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com>
To: <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>; "zak seidov" <zakseidov at yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: No further need for semi-voluntary moratorium:REJECTED SEQs


> ]I actually don't reject many.  Here's an example though:
>
> %S A000001 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 600, 
> 977, 157
> 7, 2544, 4129, 6673, 10802, 17475, 28277, 45752, 74029, 110981, 185010..
> %N A000001 fibbonacci sequence: each number is the sum of the latest two
> %e A000001 
> 0+1+0+1+1+2+3+5+8+13+21+34+55+89+144+233+377+600+977+1577+2554+4129+6
> 673+10802+17475+28277+45752+74029+110981+185010...
> %O A000001 0
> %K A000001 ,nonn,
> %A A000001 Andrew R.S.B. (giantevilmonkey at www.yahoo.com), Oct 09 2005
>
> NJAS
>