a puxxle
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Wed Apr 19 19:46:41 CEST 2006
That doesn't work. That would be 1,3,8,19, not 1,3,8,18.
It could almost be a(n) = 2a(n-1)+a(n-3)+1. That would give us:
1,3,8,18,40,89,197
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert G. Wilson v <rgwv at rgwv.com>
Everyone,
I find it difficult to believe that a order three recursion
is what the 'feds' were after. Might I suggest that what they wanted
was A079583: a(0)=1 a(n)=2*a(n-1)+n.
Bob.
>[njas]
> Dear all,
> > >>>:%S A117713 1,3,8,18,__,89,189
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list