Domino question
David Wilson
davidwwilson at comcast.net
Wed Aug 23 23:24:47 CEST 2006
In response to Richard Guy's criticisms, let me restate my problem by
example.
Let there be a standard set of dominoes with n distinct numbers, 0 through
n-1. Thus a standard set of 28 double-6 dominoes would represent the case n
= 7.
The case n = 1 is the double-0 set consisting of the single 0-0 domino. This
can be laid out on the grid as follows:
0 0
The 0's form a single 2-omino, so a(1) = 2.
The case n = 2 is the double-1 set consisting of the 3 dominoes 0-0, 0-1,
and 1-1. These can be laid out on the grid as follows:
0 0 1
0 1 1
The 0's and 1's each form a 3-omino, so there are two polyominoes in this
arrangement. Clearly we cannot form fewer, so a(2) = 2.
Similarly, for the case n = 3, the 6 double-2 dominoes can be arranged as:
2 0 0 0
2 2 0 1
2 1 1 1
which form three polyominoes, again we cannot form fewer, so a(3) = 3.
For n = 4, we have 10 double-3 dominoes. We could arrange these on the grid
in this way:
2 2 2 1
2 2 0 1
3 0 0 1
3 0 0 1
3 3 3 1
so that the minimum of 4 polyominoes is formed, and a(4) = 4.
Though my examples all happen to be rectangular, this is not required.
For n = 5 (the double-4 polyominoes), we cannot form 5 polyominoes, as this
would imply 5 pairwise adjacent regions in the plane, forbidden by the
4-color theorem. Hence a(5) > 5, I suspect a(5) = 6.
Can we extend this?
Can we do better if we omit the doubles dominoes (0-0, 1-1, etc).
-----
Thinking about this led me to the following problem:
What is the smallest possible number of regions in a planar map that is
colored in n colors, and for any pair of distinct colors, there exists an
adjacent pair of regions having those colors?
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list