unpr sequences

[David Wasserman]

Here's some more: A075788, A075789, A075790, A075791, A083435,  
A086548, A087318, A087319, A088126, A090315, A092959.

On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:12 PM, franktaw at netscape.net wrote:

> Here's a preliminary list.  There are rather more of them than I  
> thought there were.
>
> A000373, A002149, A014595-A014596, A019450, A019459, A020999,
> A022495-A022498, A023054, A023108, A038552, A046125, A052131,
> A066426, A066435, A066450, A066510, A066746, A066817, A067579,
> A068591, A071071, A071887, A072023, A072326, A072540, A074980,
> A074981, A078693, A078754, A078869, A079098, A079398, A079611,
> A080131, A080133-A080134, A080761-A080762, A085508, A086058,
> A086748, A087092, A088910, A091305, A092372-A092382, A096340,
> A098860, A099118-A099119, A105233, A105600-A105601, A108795,
> A110000, A110108, A110172, A110222-A110223, A110312, A110356,
> A112647, A112799, A112826, A118278-A118285, A120414, A121069,
> A121346, A121507-A121508
>
> I have not included here sequences which are unproved in that they  
> contain
> probable primes instead of proven primes.  I'll let somebody else  
> do that,
> assuming that Neil wants to include them in this keyword.
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>
>
> unpr[oved] is actually a good suggestion
>
> for sequences where it has not been proved
> that all (sometimes any) of the terms in the sequence are correct.
>
> - could people send me a list of A-numbers which
> should get that?
>
> Neil
>