forwarded message from Farideh
N. J. A. Sloane
njas at research.att.com
Thu Dec 14 15:46:33 CET 2006
>From mymontain at yahoo.com Thu Dec 14 08:47:53 2006
>Delivered-To: njas at research.att.com
>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
> h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
> b=Vr2+fPiy/5HLck1j9GtMe/JyGuYXKdaBZ2jXaP1/4/HzQtkZfRT3SbS/vpXU2w2xfusSPUMUrO6+NEu5qrs7vnhFU1FtIXYAF7sabqbtHWDWZ5zxGwhs291aBsvQlyFXR9qNm5qWJMDSGh6GizCskQyw9mB+5C+OIkgBtjmlexA=;
>X-YMail-OSG: YhkziQ8VM1nDHZw5DsIoiGUIfB1e_nJHPuuv3UIOFqz_BgG.5H0SR2UD4DqQfjgvzIiUAHsaao9S0tXjhYmJpISQs7I1G4_O8mzjTPGvI9vRhVaWIN4HUg--
>Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:46:48 -0800 (PST)
>From: Farideh Firoozbakht <mymontain at yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re : n - digit numbers with n factors, each with a different number of digits
>To: "N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com>,
> Joshua Zucker <joshua.zucker at gmail.com>,
> Jonathan Post <jvospost3 at gmail.com>,
> David Wilson <davidwwilson at comcast.net>, franktaw at netscape.net,
> Joerg Arndt <arndt at jjj.de>, seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.6 (2005-12-07) on
> mail-purple.research.att.com
>X-Spam-Level: **
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
> DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
> OBSCURED_EMAIL autolearn=no version=3.0.6
>
>--0-1675173946-1166104008=:69360
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>Dear Neil and seqfans,
>
> > There is no 29-digit number with exactly 29 divisors, so the sequence ends
> > here unless you want one of those evil "or 0 if no such number" sequences.
>
>> Comments and corrections welcomed!
>
> If p is a prime greater than 23 then a(p) doesn't exist. (*)
>
> Proof of (*): If p is prime then a(p) must be a p-digit number of the form q^(p-1)
> where q is prime. But if q <= 7 number of digits of q^(p-1) is less than p and if
> q > 7 & p > 23 number of digits of q^(p-1) is greater than p. Hence if p is a prime
> greater than 23, a(p) doesn't exist.
>
> But we can prove that for many numbers n greater than 29, a(n) exist.
>
> For example 10^53999 < a(54000) <= 11^2*1009^5*(10^18+9)^2999.
> Proof : if n = 11^2*1009^5*(10^18+9)^2999 then n has exactly 54000 divisors d_k
> (k=1,2, ..., 54000) and each d_k has exactly k digits. Hence a(54000) exits and
> a(54000) is a 54000-digit number less than n+1.
>
> In fact if 4 < m <= 3000 then a(18*m) exists and a(18m) < 11^2*1009^5*(10^18+9)^(m-1)+1.
>
> So I think a better definition of A125315 is:
>
> " Smallest n-digit number that has exactly n divisors, each with a different
> number of digits and zero if there is no such number. "
>
> I guess that number of n's where a(n) > 0 is infinite.
>
> Best wishes,
> Farideh.
>
> Ps. There is a problem, I can't send message to seqfans.
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Any questions? Get answers on any topic at Yahoo! Answers. Try it now.
>--0-1675173946-1166104008=:69360
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
><DIV>Dear Neil and seqfans,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>> There is no 29-digit number with exactly 29 divisors, so the sequence ends</DIV> <DIV>> here unless you want one of those evil "or 0 if no such number" sequences. </DIV> <DIV><BR>> Comments and corrections welcomed!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>If p is a prime greater than 23 then a(p) doesn't exist. (*)</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG>Proof of (*):</STRONG> If p is prime then a(p) must be a p-digit number of the form q^(p-1) </DIV> <DIV>where q is prime. But if q <= 7 number of digits of q^(p-1) is less than p and if</DIV> <DIV>q > 7 & p > 23 number of digits of q^(p-1) is greater than p. Hence if p is a prime</DIV> <DIV>greater than 23, a(p) doesn't exist.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>But we can prove that for many numbers n greater than 29, a(n) exist.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>For example 10^53999 <
> a(54000) <= 11^2*1009^5*(10^18+9)^2999. <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG>Proof :</STRONG> if n = 11^2*1009^5*(10^18+9)^2999 then n has exactly 54000 divisors d_k </DIV> <DIV>(k=1,2, ..., 54000) and each d_k has exactly k digits. Hence a(54000) exits and </DIV> <DIV>a(54000) is a 54000-digit number less than n+1.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>In fact if 4 < m <= 3000 then a(18*m) exists and a(18m) < 11^2*1009^5*(10^18+9)^(m-1)+1.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>So I think a better definition of A125315 is:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> " Smallest n-digit number that has exactly n divisors, each with a different</DIV> <DIV> number of digits and zero if there is no such number. "</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I guess that number of n's where a(n) > 0 is <STRONG>infinite</STRONG>.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Best
> wishes,</DIV> <DIV>Farideh.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Ps. There is a problem, I can't send message to seqfans.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV></DIV><p>
>
><hr size=1>Any questions? Get answers on any topic at <a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx">Yahoo! Answers</a>. Try it now.
>--0-1675173946-1166104008=:69360--
>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list