The uninteresting plot ( was: request for advice )

[cino hilliard]

Hi,


>From: "Olivier Gerard" <ogerard at ext.jussieu.fr>
>To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
>Subject: The uninteresting plot ( was: request for advice )
>Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:46:18 +0100
>
>Seqfans,
>
>this is a bit of a troll answer, but I am the admin :-) and history
>seemed too much misrepresented in the original post to let it pass.

Sorry if I erred here. I was going from memory of my past Liberal Arts 
studies, The History Channel, Biography Channel, Science Channel etc. in 
trying to make a point. I will be more carefull.

Thanks Oliver for poiinting this out.

Cino

>
>Olivier
>
>
>On 3/13/06, cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I read and deleted all the entries in this thread, except this one. I do
> > not
> > remember who wrote
> > what. Nevertheless, my mind formed some thoughts about this subject. I
> > present them here.
>
>
>Did your mind try to organize your thoughts and check basic facts before
>presenting them ?
>
>It is wonderful that Shakespeare wrote ABOUT  Kings and Queens and the
> > Wealthy and the
> > affluent and the in the know and not TO them. Why? Because they would 
>have
> > thought it
> > uninteresting.
>
>
>Many kings and influent people in the past have enjoyed plays, historical
>ones
>as well as those involving with merchant' sons and trader's daughters,
>allowing
>the very development of theatre.  And most playwrights were forced to write
>a lot
>to wealthy people to dedicate their plays, obtain the right to have them
>represented,
>printed, and were often court poets, making circumstancial pieces to
>congratulate
>the kings and queens they were writing to.  And the latter found those
>letters,
>odes, and epics speaking of their glory sufficiently interesting to give 
>the
>poets
>money or privileges.
>
>Davinci, Galileo, and many others wrote and kept their ideas
> > secret. Why? because
> > the Big shots the Journals and the Oppressive would find their work
> > uninteresting.
>
>
>They were both in close contact to the most powerful people of their
>time and land, and were directly funded by them. Notably the Medicis family
>and the Ferrare dukes. Galilelo published a lot, was a member of the
>Academia dei Lincei, etc.  Vinci was researched for his knowledge in
>architecture, casting and his design for war machines.
>
>
> > So it
> > was, so be it.
>
>
>So it rarely was, and we can try to make it even better.
>
>
> > Thanks for hearing me out.
> >
> > Heire is what I try to do in submitting sequences. Some of these are 
>from
> > the Book.
> >
> > 1. Is it in a publication?
> > 2. Does a conjecture or theorem follow?
> > 3. Is it from a website post or idea?
> > 4. Is it less than 4 repetitions of the same concept with different
> > parameters in the GF?
> > 5. Why is it interesting to me?  It occurred in a dream, watching a ball
> > game for example.
> > 6. Will the man on the street understand it? Can you explain it William 
>F
> > Buckley or George Bush?
> > 7. Does it have a practical application?
> >
> > At least 2 of these should be answered.
> > Number 4 should be manditory, unless done by the Editors. Sometime you
> > need
> > filler to curb
> > future trivial inventions to save editorial time. Number 6 is my
> > philosophy.
> > If you cannot explain it to the man on the street it Ain't worth 
>knowing.
> > That is my philosopy but I do not always abide.
> > Number 7 is 1 in a million. Perhaps the answer is a resounding yes: it 
>is
> > FUN and down the road important! This is in the same sense as does a new
> > born child have a practical application? Yes indeed!
>
>
>This kind of personal rule is to your honor. You could probably add a few
>items in the list. Our current problem is with people having no restraint.