A095205

[franktaw at netscape.net]

This entry doesn't make sense.  The title is "Beginning with 0 least number with an attempt to maintain the frequency of occurrence of digits as far as possible identical. Priority is in the order 0 to 9. At any stage the frequency of digit r must be more than any other digit s if r < s."  Interpreted literally, this would simply be the periodic sequence 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,1,2,....  The values:
 
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,23,45,67,89,102,34,56,78,90,12,43,65,87
 
make it appear that in fact the sequence is being constrained to not repeat any numbers.  However, the comment: "Obviously no term contains identical digits and eventually for some m, a(m) = 1023456789 = a(n) for all n >m..." is not consistent with this interpretation.
 
Is Amarnath available to tell us what he intended for this sequence?  If not, I'm inclined to believe that the non-repeating condition is what was intended, and fix the comment (and the definition).
 
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20060512/2cb29631/attachment.htm>