Cayley-Dickson construction

[Joerg Arndt]

* Paul D. Hanna <pauldhanna at juno.com> [May 20. 2006 08:47]:
> [...]

> Would there be any advantage to submitting a table T 
> of exponents of -1 such that  CD(n,k) = (-1)^T(n,k) 
> like as the table below? 

This question arises with all of these plus/minus one (two valued)
sequences.
IMHO a tag "two-valued" together with a search mechanism
would "fix" that issue for good.


>  
> Antidiagonal sums are simply: 
> 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,... 

Oh!
I'll see check this holds.


> [...]

> Also I find your paper very interesting. 
>     Paul 

Note how often I have to resist to create a new OEIS entry  8-)

References to the OEIS currently at sections
1.16.1, 1.16.4, 1.25, 1.25, 1.26, 1.29, 1.29,
1.29, 1.32, 2.1, 3.8.1, 3.8.1, 3.8.2, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7,
5.16.6, 5.16.6, 5.16.6, 5.16.6, 5.18, 5.21.2, 6.5,
10.12.3, 20.4.3, 21.7, 21.7.2, 21.8, 21.10.1, 22.4.2,
22.4.3, 22.4.3, 22.4.5, 22.5, 23.10, 24.1, 24.1, 24.1,
24.1, 24.2, 24.3, 24.3, 24.5, 24.8.3, 24.8.3, 24.8.4,
24.11, 24.11, 24.11, 24.11.2, 24.11.2, 24.11.3, 24.11.3,
24.11.3, 24.11.4, 24.13, 24.13.1