primes in arithmetic progression

[Jonathan Post]

Sorry, Olivier.  I hope not to repeat the mistake.

Thank you again, Richard J. Mathar, for your corrections and extensions of 6
Nov 2006, which appear online today for A124570.  I'm surprised that nobody
looked in this direction, before you started it.  NJAS was right to see the
value, and 'kick things off" -- and I hope that it does not stop with my
clumsy shot at the semiprime case, which you so gallantly repaired.

I'm mostly satisfied with the results of myself and tens of millions of
others voting in the U.S. elections Tuesday 7 Nove 2006.  I feel as if the
whole country is being corrected and extended, to benefits both domestic and
global. But this is not the venue to discuss that.



On 11/4/06, Olivier Gerard <olivier.gerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> Thanks for this message.
>
> Please remember NOT to send your posts to seqfan as HTML,
> even with a pure text version.
>
> regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> On 11/4/06, Jonathan Post <jvospost3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The analogue for 3-almost primes (or, as njas prefers, numbers which are
> > the product of exactly 3 primes) is left as an exercise for the reader...
> > I've just submitted the following.
> >
> > Subject: PRE-NUMBERED NEW SEQUENCE A124570 FROM Jonathan Vos Post
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20061108/d85183d4/attachment-0002.htm>