A082812
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Thu Oct 12 19:28:32 CEST 2006
"Positions of sign changes in running sum of mu(k)/k: n such that
sign(Sum(k=1..n; mu(k)/k)) <> sign(Sum(k=1..n+1; mu(k)/k))."
Has the comment: "Sequence is infinite since Sum(k=1..inf; mu(k)/k)
equals 1/Zeta(1)= 0."
The sequence may well be infinite, but the argument given is not
sufficient to establish it. Can anybody do so?
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list