A071810
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Fri Sep 8 01:48:37 CEST 2006
This sequence (Number of subsets of the first n primes whose sum is a
prime) has the comment "... a(n+1) < 2*a(n). Therefore Lim -> oo,
a(n)/2^n = 0". I have two problems with this:
1) It is not obvious that a(n+1) < 2*a(n).
2) The "therefore" does not follow.
So,
1) Can anybody show that a(n+1) < 2*a(n) [for n > 1].
2) Can anybody show that a(n+1) < c*a(n) for some c < 2 and n
sufficiently large?
3) Note that (2) suffices to prove the limit above. Failing that, some
other proof of the limit would be nice.
4) Can anybody evaluate lim_{n->infinity} a(n+1)/a(n)?
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list