RE is this worth submitting?

[Jud McCranie]

At 10:40 PM 9/12/2006, Tautócrona wrote:

>Andrew Weimholt:
> >>If x^0 is considered a power of x, then the sequence becomes
> >>1, 2, 6, 12, 25, 85, 194, 590, 1695, 4879, 19077, 83994, 167988, 1041780
>
>Jud Macranie:
> >I'm working on it.  It appears that each term is at least twice as
> >large as the previous one.  Has that been proved/conjectured?
>
>Therefore, yes! The minimum a_(k+1) possible is 2·ak!

Thanks.  There are a few cases where 2*a_k is met exactly.

I've submitted a couple more terms, the ones < 10^7.