Sigma,USigma,UPhi 2
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Sat Sep 2 14:15:08 CEST 2006
You lost the k0 in there. There are no solutions to sigma(m)^2 =
uSigma(m) * uPhi(m)
It would be better to state this in terms of divisibility; you are
looking for uSigma(m) * uPhi(m) divides sigma(m)^2, etc.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: zbi74583 at boat.zero.ad.jp
Hi,Seqfans
I considered about the equations as follows.
f_i(m)*f_j(m)=k0*f_k(m)*f_l(m) , for some integer k0
where 0<=i,j,k,l<=3
f_0(m)=Sigma(m)
f_1(m)=UnitarySigma(m)
f_2(m)=UnitaryPhi(m)
f_3(m)=m
Ordinary, these equations have a few solutions, but the following
three
equations have exceptionally many solutions.
Sigma(m)^2= UnitarySigma(m)*UnitaryPhi(m) .... E.1
UnitarySigma(m)^2= Sigma(m)*UnitaryPhi(m) .... E.2
Sigma(m)*UnitarySigma(m)= UnitaryPhi(m)^2 .... E.3
The solutions are as follows.
S_1 :
1,2,3,6,14,15,30,35,42,70,78,105,190,210,348*,357,418,570,714,910,1045,12
54,2090,2730,....
S_2 :
1,2,3,6,14,15,30,35,42,70,78,105,190,210,357,418,570,714,910,1045,1254,19
76*,2090,2730,....
S_3 :
1,2,3,6,14,15,30,35,42,70,78,105,190,210,312*,357,418,570,714,910,1045,12
54,1428*,2090,....
These sequences are similar, but different. See the terms with "*".
The reason why they have the same terms is that if a solution is
square
free then Sigma(m) and UnitarySigma(m) becomes the same, so E.1 and E.2
and E,3
become the same.
Yasutoshi
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list