don't understand A056784

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Sat Sep 30 06:00:45 CEST 2006


Richard, I agree that that sequence is unclear.  I suppose
you tried writing to the author?

If nothing better appears in the next day or two, I suggest you
submit a correction that follows his definition, quoting
from your message
The sequence I would have expected is 1,8,90,524,9552,31398,2010734,..
associated with run lengths of 1,3,7,17,35,71,147,..
(and loosely related to one plus a number in A002386)

Best 

Neil






More information about the SeqFan mailing list