Partition into strokes
Max Alekseyev
maxale at gmail.com
Thu Aug 23 04:45:47 CEST 2007
On 8/22/07, koh <zbi74583 at boat.zero.ad.jp> wrote:
> > Or, "Partition of a graph G into strokes S_i" must satisfy the following conditions.
> >
> > o Union_{i} S_i = H
> > o If not{i=j} -> S_i and S_j don't have the same edge
> > o If not{i=j} -> S_i U S_j isn't a dipath
> > o For all i S_i is a dipath
> > Where H is a digraph on G
[...]
> "Partition of a graph G into strokes" means "Partition of a digraph H on graph G into strokes".
But what is exactly "a digraph on graph" ?
> See the four conditions.
>
> 2) n=3
> o-o-o names of vertices 1-2-3
>
> Partitions into strokes :
> 1->2->3
> 3->2->1
> 1->2, 3->2
> 2->1, 2->3
> So, a(3)=4
I'm confused. All listed partitions represent partitions of
*different* digraphs.
Say, the first partition is of the digraph ( 1 -> 2 -> 3 ) while the
last partition is of the digraph ( 1 <- 2 -> 3 ). Clearly, these
digraphs are different.
So, what is H in this case and what exactly the equality "Union_{i}
S_i = H" from your definition means?
Regards,
Max
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list