Re^2: Abundant numbers of form n^a+n+1

[Richard Mathar]

since that is what the thread was about.
Return-Path: <jvospost3 at gmail.com>
X-Ids: 168
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=xJQKJp1KTXGvTHedKdu3rA0GlL4MRD1k34bAK41UQTA=;
        b=dkpO5kBaYQxQeBPuRh2FJ56rBxP6CGw+cV/WpjEDjW5vaOvdip3zyaiovYwI/TaEK7nf/RREWMXx+cTzQtuGlOvd04jGOajeoZvOtSQvKgRZQaXXcqINRV/Ad5VxL+PS2KYSB9caHd2r4Ds6whc6Dew+TS4IakcN3QLyPvRdyJY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gwZ6QDli5Cr6/bXTFdOIpQ/hx0fKXlpFeXEt9E1WQtl8c3Mttyf+UIjI5ZBo/hvdxbjyiahrG1w49vM6KvUOuvwZBzPjFnOyQSpXVgonr/4MMh8kwE0jNGf1rkvOZeMTr3c2A6BtfHleX6G6Ch2sUOJA+eQAGlMC2fP8y7AUv/U=
Message-ID: <5542af940712071113xe9f307dk345f8d6023152dc0 at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 11:13:27 -0800
From: "Jonathan Post" <jvospost3 at gmail.com>
To: "Hans Havermann" <pxp at rogers.com>
Subject: Re: Re^3: Abundant numbers of form n^a+n+1
Cc: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr, "jonathan post" <jvospost2 at yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8DA656A-1DFC-42D0-A029-898191AF2805 at rogers.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200712071758.lB7Hwjb2003441 at amer.strw.leidenuniv.nl>
	 <F8DA656A-1DFC-42D0-A029-898191AF2805 at rogers.com>
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:13:29 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/5031/Fri Dec  7 19:39:46 2007 on shiva.jussieu.fr
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 47599B58.001 on shiva.jussieu.fr : j-chkmail score : X : 0/50 1 0.372 -> 1
X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 47599B58.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!

Yes, although half of each pair of amicable numbers must be abundant...

On 12/7/07, Hans Havermann <pxp at rogers.com> wrote:
> > I should add that this was steering of the main thread and a search
> > for *amicable* numbers of the form n^2+n+1, whereas the original
> > problem
> > dealt with *abundant* numbers.
>
> Indeed. Although Neil wrote amicable, I'm sure he meant abundant,
> since that is what the thread was about.
>
>