Ternary analogue of A094913?

[N. J. A. Sloane]

As I see it, the sequence

A024521  	 	 First elementary symmetric function of {1, p(1), p(2),
..., p(n-1)}, where p(0) = 1.
	1, 2, 6, 11, 18, 29, 42, 59, 78, 101, 130,

is an erroneous version of

A014284  	 	 Partial sums of primes (starting with 1).
	1, 3, 6, 11, 18, 29, 42, 59, 78, 101, 130,

I suggest the following edit (please react if somebody does not agree):

%I A024521
%S A024521 1,2,6,11,18,29,42,59,78,101,130,161,198,239,282,329,382,441,502,569,640,
%T A024521 713,792,875,964,1061,1162,1265,1372,1481,1594,1721,1852,1989,2128,2277,
%U A024521 2428,2585,2748,2915,3088,3267,3448,3639,3832
%N A024521 erroneous version of A014284
%C A024521 The original definition read:
%C A024521 "First elementary symmetric function of {1, p(1), p(2),
..., p(n-1)}, where p(0) = 1."
%C A024521 However, in that case the second term should be a(2) = 1+2
= 3. - M. Hasler, Dec 11 2007
%Y A024521 Adjacent sequences: A024518 A024519 A024520 this_sequence
A024522 A024523 A024524
%Y A024521 Sequence in context: A104813 A039745 A037258 this_sequence
A048204 A058760 A085573
%K A024521 nonn,dead
%O A024521 1,2
%A A024521 Clark Kimberling (ck6(AT)evansville.edu)
%E A024521 Edited by Maximilian F. Hasler
(maximilian.hasler(AT)gmail.com), Dec 11 2007