comments on A001835, A004253, A001653

[David Wasserman]

> >>%C A083905 Conjecture: a(3*A006288) = 0.
> 
> >Conjecture 113 seems to be given in a wrong direction in your paper.
> >You ask to prove that if a(3k)=0 then k belongs to A006288. But it is
> >opposite to proving that a(3*A006288) = 0.
> 
> This is a proof to the corrected Conjecture 113 given by RIP from
> russian forum http://lib.mexmat.ru/forum/

Great!  njas, can you please update that A083905 entry as proven
by RIP?


Regards,
ralf