Possible duplicate

[Augustine Munagi]

Hi Seqfan,
Additionally, the relation A108458(n,k)=A124502(n+k,k+1) shows that
the sequences are related like "multichoose" to "choose". I suggest a
merging of the sequences by inserting the definition of A108458 as a
comment in A124502 with the above relation.
Else A108458 as presently displayed is inaccurate, and indeed leaves
us with a duplicate.



On 7/16/07, Augustine Munagi <aomunagi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Seqfans,
>
> They should not be the same unless the definition of A108458 is
> modified. A108458 needs improvement.
> They are not transposes, even though A108458(n,k)=A124502(n+k,k+1) for
> fixed k. By definition A108458 is infinite both downwards and to the
> right while A124502 is finite to the right.
>
>
>
> On 7/15/07, Vladeta Jovovic <vladeta at eunet.yu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > A124502 is essentially the same as A108458?
> >
> > http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A108458
> >
> > http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A124502
> >
> > V.
>