Is 8795 especially uninteresting

[Tanya Khovanova]

It was intended as a joke, of course, but a sequence with this
definition does exist: it just can't be added to OEIS.

--Joshua

On 6/2/07, Maximilian Hasler <maximilian.hasler at gmail.com> wrote:
> This poses the same logical problem as the simpler "numbers not
> starting a sequence in the OEIS" (tacitly understanding "positive
> numbers, given in increasing order,...").
> A sequence with either of these definitions cannot exist.
> Maximilian
>
> On 6/1/07, Joshua Zucker <joshua.zucker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Don't forget the sequence
> > a(n) = smallest number not appearing as the nth term of a sequence in OEIS.
> >
> > --Joshua Zucker
>