185 is special

[zak seidov]

Jon,
JA = initials of one 
of those high-brow mathematicians
which dislike plain SFs
Zak 

--- Jon Schoenfield <jonscho at hiwaay.net> wrote:

> Zak,
> 
> > or you are NOT SF
> > (even if you are JA).
> 
> Maybe this is because I haven't been on the SeqFan
> list very long ... but I 
> don't know what "JA" stands for.  (Am I correct to
> guess that "SF" means "a 
> sequence fan"?)
> 
> Thanks, and best wishes,
> 
> -- Jon
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "zak seidov" <zakseidov at yahoo.com>
> To: "David Wilson" <davidwwilson at comcast.net>; "Jon
> Schoenfield" 
> <jonscho at hiwaay.net>; <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>
> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: 185 is special
> 
> 
> > As I said,
> > or 185 IS interesting to you,
> > or you are NOT SF
> > (even if you are JA).
> >
> > If anyone each time when he said:
> > "this number (or this sequence) is uniteresting"
> > would add "to me"
> > i'd be perfectly OK.
> >
> > Why this unterested people
> > don't do something more interesting to them,
> > I've never understood...
> >
> > Highly interested one,
> > Zak
> >
> > --- David Wilson <davidwwilson at comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> 185 is special in the amount of attention it has
> >> received in this mailing
> >> list recently.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
> > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> >
>
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091




i've picked up some bug, so did not have the strength
to do much editing

new version of oeis with many new sequences that need work
(in about 10 minutes)
I did not even have the strength to add "uned" to
a lot of them.

there are several interesting sequences from new contributors
and too many uninteresting sequences from the usual suspects.
how about showing some restraint, folks?

I have 591 comments waiting to be processed

Neil