many seqs need editing

[jonscho at hiwaay.net]

All -- my apologies!  I obviously sent the email below inadvertently!  :-o

Neil -- I do hope you're feeling much better soon (and I apologize for the 
additional Inbox clutter)!

A quick comment re A129401 and your comment posted on it, i.e.,
<< I thought this was already in the OEIS. - njas, Jun 04 2007 >>

It seems A129401 is simply a prime-free version of A003961 (or the near-
duplicate A045965).

Get well soon,

-- Jon

> Neil,
> 
> 'Hope you're feeling much better soon!  :-(
[snip]



I've reached the top of my file. For whatever reason I've encountered much
better "hygine" in sequences near the top, thus I've finished faster than I
expected. I plan to do another search in a month or so, this time by
truncating a small number of terms from the beginning and end of each
(if not most or all) of you know more math than me so you can evaluate them
faster (a matter of minutes for you as opposed to a matter of hours for me).
I hope, Neil, that you feel better soon!


Straightforward duplicates:

A120660 and A120662
A071569 and A096740 and A096749 and A096765
A108197 and A126390
A122122 and A125643
A124311 and A124312
A103274 and A110935
A096994 and A096995
A088117 and A088118
A071955 and A103165


Possible duplicates:

A075821 and A100991 (after adjusting for offset differences)
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=id:A075821|id:A100991

A117943 and A126617 (After adusting for offset differences. Definitions
appear to me to be the same)
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=id:A117943|id:A126617