Correction Re: duplicate hunting, pt. 16

[Ralf Stephan]

> > A096299 and A110382 (possibility noted in comments for A110382)
> 
> Definitely not because A110382(1023) = 1234567900 which is not in
> lexicographic order. BTW, the g.f. of A110382 is
> 
> %F A110382 G.f.: 1/(1+x) * Sum{k>=0, (10^(k+1)-1)/9 * x^2^k/(1+x^2^k) }.

Make that

%F A110382 G.f.: 1/(1-x) * Sum{k>=0, (10^(k+1)-1)/9 * x^2^k/(1+x^2^k) }.

and the sequence is not base, only the orig. definition is!


ralf




Straightforward duplicates:

A087852 and A087853
A101405 and A117279
A100675 and A124072
A097874 and A097885
A107450 and A107451
A123202 and A123203
A122505 and A122507
A094055 and A094056
A091524 and A091525


Possible duplicates:

A087839 and A106742
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=id:A087839|id:A106742

A076725 and A114951
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=id:A076725|id:A114951