Question about names of sequences

[N. J. A. Sloane]

search for "skew digraph", or whatevver it was, the
sequence will come up?
Return-Path: <njas at research.att.com>
X-Ids: 168
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:09:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: "N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com>
Message-Id: <200710311609.l9VG97Is4912091 at fry.research.att.com>
To: "Alexander Povolotsky" <apovolot at gmail.com>,
   "Maximilian Hasler" <maximilian.hasler at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A000522 vs A131178 ?
Cc: "Sequence Fans" <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>
Reply-To: njas at research.att.com
References: <144987c90710291558x435a71d7la59af6514484d7ef at mail.gmail.com>
    <3c3af2330710292032r6d11e0c5nb802ffd30a24aade at mail.gmail.com>
    <144987c90710300600r2d3605feoc70101b2276f128a at mail.gmail.com>
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:09:13 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/4648/Wed Oct 31 15:11:06 2007 on shiva.jussieu.fr
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4728A8A9.003 on shiva.jussieu.fr : j-chkmail score : X : 0/50 0 0.507 -> 1
X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4728A8A9.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
Return-Path: <apovolot at gmail.com>
X-Ids: 164
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=hGzZKCrPJQN688MN7+YItka2VIvG/ebfOjY6HJS5kRA=;
        b=TybG44UztRbp9e5DAAeI7thUfIH+YpgjcrzA15d5CRFgCF0LXK1JJ8LkcvkmNduH79ob4eUPCgOxepNotnR7JD6C0m9TGPRlC+FLtMLQ8hLp2ERXgjaaA4GjT4HuaR2xUbTYyWL6ovWEZZSQDqCB9mFH5OWKH+O51EbozbVwttc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=o1ILjeWFTEJ9D2tj2cn/V5LrrltplBDj/MCXcqtrYkU3/4V10t7su0+RW2bM4xOpkc/kMUoGyNLxEQGaaPueHsHexlHTEaR/+lCs6CYEAWxjpKmVcp0RJP/EDcDTvsWmDqJlSLzmhePnqAftmzERjzqNOCmnRYLB8VzlETyLTmQ=
Message-ID: <144987c90710311007k2215cb20s666a5a4ff2fa88bd at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:07:44 -0400
From: "Alexander Povolotsky" <apovolot at gmail.com>
To: njas at research.att.com
Subject: Re: A045620 vs A084664 - essentially duplicates ?
Cc: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
In-Reply-To: <144987c90710241545s560c750eg4a8c4e20dd901dd7 at mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <144987c90710241545s560c750eg4a8c4e20dd901dd7 at mail.gmail.com>
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.164]); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:07:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/4649/Wed Oct 31 16:27:15 2007 on shiva.jussieu.fr
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4728B662.001 on shiva.jussieu.fr : j-chkmail score : X : 0/50 1 0.369 -> 1
X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4728B662.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!

Hi Dear Neil,

Does it also makes sense to merge A045620 and A084664

A045620  Digits of cube contain digits of square.
 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 65, 100, 146, 250, 405, 500, 510, 521, 615, 650,
768, 945, 965, 1000, 1004, 1040, 1050, 1085, 1126, 1145, 1203, 1216,
1219, 1222, 1452, 1460, 1476, 1480, 1482, 1638, 1706, 1878, 2002,
2020, 2199, 2204, 2260, 2276, 2326, 2450, 2470, 2476 (list; graph;
listen)

 A084664  Digits of n^3 include digits of n^2.

 0, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 65, 100, 146, 250, 405, 500, 510, 521, 615, 650,
768, 945, 965, 1000, 1004, 1040, 1050, 1085, 1126, 1145, 1203, 1216,
1219, 1222, 1452, 1460, 1476, 1480, 1482, 1638, 1706, 1878, 2002,
2020, 2199, 2204, 2260, 2276, 2326, 2450, 2470, 2476 (list; graph;
listen)

AP
*****************************************************************************

On 10/24/07, Alexander Povolotsky <apovolot at gmail.com> wrote:
> SORRY IF IT WAS ALREADY DISCUSSED IN THE PAST ....
> A045620 vs A084664 - are essentially duplicates ?
>