Sum of prime rereciprocals?

[David W. Cantrell]

Indeed, there is a typo. The inequality symbol in the definition of 
A136616 needs to be reversed.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David W. Wilson" <wilson.d at anseri.com>
To: <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 15:19
Subject: RE: Sum of prime rereciprocals?


> By its definition, A136616 has no elements.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David W. Cantrell [mailto:DWCantrell at sigmaxi.net]
>> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 10:15 AM
>> To: David W. Wilson; seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
>> Subject: Re: Sum of prime rereciprocals?
>>
>> Yes, it's interesting. But except for the first term, all the terms 
>> of
>> your sequence are simply
>> 1 more than those of
>>
>> http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A136616
>>
>> David
>
>