A112773 vs A116944 ? - both have same terms (except that A116944 has two extra initial terms)

[Maximilian Hasler]

If there will be a vote, I'd vote of eliminating at least one of these ;
A112773 would be my favourite for elimination since it is contained in
A116944 as a subsequence (a search for the id of the former does not
reveal a reference to it). Only the %C A112773 would need adjustment
before merging ("except for initial terms" resp. "-{6}" => "U {3}").
Maximilian

> A112773                  Three times the odd primes.
>         9, 15, 21, 33, 39, 51, 57, 69, 87, 93, 111, 123, 129, 141, 159, 177,
>  Same as A001748 - {6}.

>  A116944                 3 together with primes multiplied by 3.
>         3, 6, 9, 15, 21, 33, 39, 51, 57, 69, 87, 93, 111, 123, 129, 141, 159,

A001748  	 	 Primes X 3.
	6, 9, 15, 21, 33, 39, 51, 57, 69, 87, 93, 111, 123, 129, 141, 159,
177, 183, 201, 213,